QuickAppend/Case Studies/An enterprise tech team tripled ABM return in a single quarter.
Case Study · Enterprise SaaS

An enterprise tech team tripled ABM return in a single quarter.

Technographic & Intent Enrichment90-day deployment6 min read
Industry
Enterprise SaaS
Team
Marketing & RevOps
Target list
~4,000 accounts
Services
Technographic · Intent
Timeline
90 days

At a glance

The team had a strong ABM motion, but the target-account list was too broad and lacked the enrichment needed to prioritize accounts based on technology and buying intent.

The outcome, in one quarter
3×
Return on ABM spend versus prior quarter
+61%
Marketing-sourced pipeline from target accounts
2.2×
Meeting-booked rate on prioritized accounts
94%
Technographic match rate across target list

The challenge

The program wasn't broken on paper. The target list was well-defined, the creative was sharp, and budget was approved. What was missing was the one thing that makes account-based marketing work: knowing which accounts were actually ready to buy, and why.

  • No stack visibilityThe team couldn't see which accounts ran complementary tools worth a tailored pitch, or which ran a direct competitor worth a displacement play.
  • No timing signal.Outreach went out on a calendar, not on demand, so most of it landed months before or after an account was in-market.
  • Eroding trust.After enough flat quarters, sales had stopped believing the target list reflected real opportunity.
In the CRM, every account looked the same, so we treated them the same. Our data gave us no reason to spend more on the accounts that were actually ready to buy.

The approach

Instead of rebuilding the ABM program, the team enriched the existing target list with two signals: the technology each account was running and the buying intent those accounts were showing.

Technographic enrichment

We mapped the core technology stack across the target accounts, identifying complementary tools, competing platforms, and technology patterns that indicated a stronger fit for the team's solution.

Intent enrichment

We layered intent signals on top of the technology data to identify accounts actively researching relevant topics, evaluating alternatives, or showing other signs of being in-market.

How enrichment split the 4,000-account list
In-market now
18% · 720 accounts
Adjacent stack
34% · 1,360 accounts
Displacement
22% · 880 accounts
No active signal
26% · 1,040 accounts
Enrichment turned one undifferentiated list into four workable segments, and flagged the ~18% worth acting on first.

What changed

The enriched list changed how the team allocated attention. Instead of treating every account as equally valuable, marketing and sales could prioritize accounts based on fit, intent, and the timing of the opportunity.

  • Prioritization.A single fit-and-intent score decided who got worked first, so effort followed evidence.
  • Messaging.Each segment got outreach built around its actual stack instead of a generic pitch.
  • Timing.Intent surges triggered plays within days, catching accounts inside their buying window.

The results

Inside one quarter, return on ABM spend tripled. Marketing-sourced pipeline from target accounts rose 61%, the meeting-booked rate on prioritized accounts more than doubled, and the technographic match rate across the list hit 94%, giving the team confidence the segmentation reflected reality.

Quarter over quarter
Prior quarterThis quarter
ABM return
100
3×
MSP pipeline
100
+61%
Meeting rate
100
2.2
Indexed to the prior quarter (= 100). Same target list, same budget; the lift came from acting on signal.
← Back to all case studies

Technographic and intent enrichment turned a flat, evenly-funded program into a targeting engine, without changing the target list, the creative, or the budget. Just the signal underneath it.

Want results like these?

Send us a sample of your target accounts. We'll run a free audit and show you exactly what technographic and intent enrichment could unlock for your program.

Speak with a specialist